<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steven Soderbergh&#8217;s Spalding Gray Documentary Is A Possible Criterion Release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://criterioncast.com/2010/03/16/steven-soderberghs-spalding-gray-documentary-is-a-possible-criterion-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://criterioncast.com/2010/03/16/steven-soderberghs-spalding-gray-documentary-is-a-possible-criterion-release/</link>
	<description>Dedicated To Important Classic And Contemporary Films</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:55:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://criterioncast.com/2010/03/16/steven-soderberghs-spalding-gray-documentary-is-a-possible-criterion-release/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 03:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://criterioncast.com/?p=2257#comment-370</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by CriterionCast: [Blog Post] Steven Soderbergh&#039;s Spalding Gray Documentary Is A Possible Criterion Release http://bit.ly/aoNAaG...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by CriterionCast: [Blog Post] Steven Soderbergh&#8217;s Spalding Gray Documentary Is A Possible Criterion Release <a href="http://bit.ly/aoNAaG.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/aoNAaG..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WestAnthony</title>
		<link>http://criterioncast.com/2010/03/16/steven-soderberghs-spalding-gray-documentary-is-a-possible-criterion-release/comment-page-1/#comment-1058</link>
		<dc:creator>WestAnthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://criterioncast.com/?p=2257#comment-1058</guid>
		<description>Spalding Gray was a massive talent.  His death still saddens me.  A collection of his three filmed monologues -- with Soderbergh&#039;s documentary -- would be quite the feather in Criterion&#039;s cap... especially since those films had three different distributors.  Obtaining the rights to all of them may prove to be a Herculean feat; it might be easier for Criterion to just go with Soderbergh&#039;s doc and &quot;Gray&#039;s Anatomy&quot;.  To watch all three films in sequential order is to see an amazing evolution of the melding of Gray&#039;s work with cinematic technique.  &quot;Swimming To Cambodia&quot; was directed by Jonathan Demme in a style very much like that of the Talking Heads concert film &quot;Stop Making Sense&quot; -- a spare, unobtrusive record of a stage performance, Demme making no effort to call attention to himself.  Gray&#039;s second film, &quot;Monster In A Box&quot;, had more camera movement and more varied lighting, but at its core it was still just a guy behind a desk telling a story (about trying to write his first novel; incidentally, if you have a chance to read that novel, &quot;Impossible Vacation&quot;, don&#039;t.  The thing was wretchedly self-indulgent, and I say this as a fan).  Steven Soderbergh&#039;s direction of &quot;Gray&#039;s Anatomy&quot; was really a quantum leap in terms of Gray&#039;s screen presentation:  in addition to camera movement and lighting, there were colored backgrounds, props and sets flying in and out of frame -- even Gray&#039;s beloved desk occasionally took a powder.  As if that weren&#039;t enough, Soderbergh contextualizes Gray&#039;s monologue (about a problem with his peepers) by including the testimony of several documentary subjects (photographed in black and white) who tell harrowing tales of the heinous shit that happened to their eyes; I&#039;m not normally squeamish, but being ludicrously nearsighted all my life, I&#039;ve always been sensitive about my eyes, and this stuff completely squeamed me.  Of those three films (I don&#039;t count &quot;Terrors Of Pleasure&quot; because it was made for public TV... but it would be cool to get that into a Gray collection too), my favorite as a monologue is still &quot;Monster In A Box&quot;, but my favorite as a film is &quot;Gray&#039;s Anatomy&quot;.  I certainly hope Criterion can get their mitts on all of them; I&#039;ll refrain from watching them anytime soon just in case.  And whilst we&#039;re on the subject of Soderbergh and Gray, how&#039;s about those Criterion dudes get the rights to &quot;King Of The Hill&quot; -- that picture is brilliant, and it&#039;s not even available on DVD!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spalding Gray was a massive talent.  His death still saddens me.  A collection of his three filmed monologues &#8212; with Soderbergh&#39;s documentary &#8212; would be quite the feather in Criterion&#39;s cap&#8230; especially since those films had three different distributors.  Obtaining the rights to all of them may prove to be a Herculean feat; it might be easier for Criterion to just go with Soderbergh&#39;s doc and &#8220;Gray&#39;s Anatomy&#8221;.  To watch all three films in sequential order is to see an amazing evolution of the melding of Gray&#39;s work with cinematic technique.  &#8220;Swimming To Cambodia&#8221; was directed by Jonathan Demme in a style very much like that of the Talking Heads concert film &#8220;Stop Making Sense&#8221; &#8212; a spare, unobtrusive record of a stage performance, Demme making no effort to call attention to himself.  Gray&#39;s second film, &#8220;Monster In A Box&#8221;, had more camera movement and more varied lighting, but at its core it was still just a guy behind a desk telling a story (about trying to write his first novel; incidentally, if you have a chance to read that novel, &#8220;Impossible Vacation&#8221;, don&#39;t.  The thing was wretchedly self-indulgent, and I say this as a fan).  Steven Soderbergh&#39;s direction of &#8220;Gray&#39;s Anatomy&#8221; was really a quantum leap in terms of Gray&#39;s screen presentation:  in addition to camera movement and lighting, there were colored backgrounds, props and sets flying in and out of frame &#8212; even Gray&#39;s beloved desk occasionally took a powder.  As if that weren&#39;t enough, Soderbergh contextualizes Gray&#39;s monologue (about a problem with his peepers) by including the testimony of several documentary subjects (photographed in black and white) who tell harrowing tales of the heinous shit that happened to their eyes; I&#39;m not normally squeamish, but being ludicrously nearsighted all my life, I&#39;ve always been sensitive about my eyes, and this stuff completely squeamed me.  Of those three films (I don&#39;t count &#8220;Terrors Of Pleasure&#8221; because it was made for public TV&#8230; but it would be cool to get that into a Gray collection too), my favorite as a monologue is still &#8220;Monster In A Box&#8221;, but my favorite as a film is &#8220;Gray&#39;s Anatomy&#8221;.  I certainly hope Criterion can get their mitts on all of them; I&#39;ll refrain from watching them anytime soon just in case.  And whilst we&#39;re on the subject of Soderbergh and Gray, how&#39;s about those Criterion dudes get the rights to &#8220;King Of The Hill&#8221; &#8212; that picture is brilliant, and it&#39;s not even available on DVD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WestAnthony</title>
		<link>http://criterioncast.com/2010/03/16/steven-soderberghs-spalding-gray-documentary-is-a-possible-criterion-release/comment-page-1/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>WestAnthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://criterioncast.com/?p=2257#comment-342</guid>
		<description>Spalding Gray was a massive talent.  His death still saddens me.  A collection of his three filmed monologues -- with Soderbergh&#039;s documentary -- would be quite the feather in Criterion&#039;s cap... especially since those films had three different distributors.  Obtaining the rights to all of them may prove to be a Herculean feat; it might be easier for Criterion to just go with Soderbergh&#039;s doc and &quot;Gray&#039;s Anatomy&quot;.  To watch all three films in sequential order is to see an amazing evolution of the melding of Gray&#039;s work with cinematic technique.  &quot;Swimming To Cambodia&quot; was directed by Jonathan Demme in a style very much like that of the Talking Heads concert film &quot;Stop Making Sense&quot; -- a spare, unobtrusive record of a stage performance, Demme making no effort to call attention to himself.  Gray&#039;s second film, &quot;Monster In A Box&quot;, had more camera movement and more varied lighting, but at its core it was still just a guy behind a desk telling a story (about trying to write his first novel; incidentally, if you have a chance to read that novel, &quot;Impossible Vacation&quot;, don&#039;t.  The thing was wretchedly self-indulgent, and I say this as a fan).  Steven Soderbergh&#039;s direction of &quot;Gray&#039;s Anatomy&quot; was really a quantum leap in terms of Gray&#039;s screen presentation:  in addition to camera movement and lighting, there were colored backgrounds, props and sets flying in and out of frame -- even Gray&#039;s beloved desk occasionally took a powder.  As if that weren&#039;t enough, Soderbergh contextualizes Gray&#039;s monologue (about a problem with his peepers) by including the testimony of several documentary subjects (photographed in black and white) who tell harrowing tales of the heinous shit that happened to their eyes; I&#039;m not normally squeamish, but being ludicrously nearsighted all my life, I&#039;ve always been sensitive about my eyes, and this stuff completely squeamed me.  Of those three films (I don&#039;t count &quot;Terrors Of Pleasure&quot; because it was made for public TV... but it would be cool to get that into a Gray collection too), my favorite as a monologue is still &quot;Monster In A Box&quot;, but my favorite as a film is &quot;Gray&#039;s Anatomy&quot;.  I certainly hope Criterion can get their mitts on all of them; I&#039;ll refrain from watching them anytime soon just in case.  And whilst we&#039;re on the subject of Soderbergh and Gray, how&#039;s about those Criterion dudes get the rights to &quot;King Of The Hill&quot; -- that picture is brilliant, and it&#039;s not even available on DVD!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spalding Gray was a massive talent.  His death still saddens me.  A collection of his three filmed monologues &#8212; with Soderbergh&#39;s documentary &#8212; would be quite the feather in Criterion&#39;s cap&#8230; especially since those films had three different distributors.  Obtaining the rights to all of them may prove to be a Herculean feat; it might be easier for Criterion to just go with Soderbergh&#39;s doc and &#8220;Gray&#39;s Anatomy&#8221;.  To watch all three films in sequential order is to see an amazing evolution of the melding of Gray&#39;s work with cinematic technique.  &#8220;Swimming To Cambodia&#8221; was directed by Jonathan Demme in a style very much like that of the Talking Heads concert film &#8220;Stop Making Sense&#8221; &#8212; a spare, unobtrusive record of a stage performance, Demme making no effort to call attention to himself.  Gray&#39;s second film, &#8220;Monster In A Box&#8221;, had more camera movement and more varied lighting, but at its core it was still just a guy behind a desk telling a story (about trying to write his first novel; incidentally, if you have a chance to read that novel, &#8220;Impossible Vacation&#8221;, don&#39;t.  The thing was wretchedly self-indulgent, and I say this as a fan).  Steven Soderbergh&#39;s direction of &#8220;Gray&#39;s Anatomy&#8221; was really a quantum leap in terms of Gray&#39;s screen presentation:  in addition to camera movement and lighting, there were colored backgrounds, props and sets flying in and out of frame &#8212; even Gray&#39;s beloved desk occasionally took a powder.  As if that weren&#39;t enough, Soderbergh contextualizes Gray&#39;s monologue (about a problem with his peepers) by including the testimony of several documentary subjects (photographed in black and white) who tell harrowing tales of the heinous shit that happened to their eyes; I&#39;m not normally squeamish, but being ludicrously nearsighted all my life, I&#39;ve always been sensitive about my eyes, and this stuff completely squeamed me.  Of those three films (I don&#39;t count &#8220;Terrors Of Pleasure&#8221; because it was made for public TV&#8230; but it would be cool to get that into a Gray collection too), my favorite as a monologue is still &#8220;Monster In A Box&#8221;, but my favorite as a film is &#8220;Gray&#39;s Anatomy&#8221;.  I certainly hope Criterion can get their mitts on all of them; I&#39;ll refrain from watching them anytime soon just in case.  And whilst we&#39;re on the subject of Soderbergh and Gray, how&#39;s about those Criterion dudes get the rights to &#8220;King Of The Hill&#8221; &#8212; that picture is brilliant, and it&#39;s not even available on DVD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

