<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Janus Teases At New Charlie Chaplin Site, Unveils Poster Art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://criterioncast.com/2010/06/12/janus-teases-at-new-charlie-chaplin-site-unveils-poster-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://criterioncast.com/2010/06/12/janus-teases-at-new-charlie-chaplin-site-unveils-poster-art/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:44:14 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Blakeslee</title>
		<link>http://criterioncast.com/2010/06/12/janus-teases-at-new-charlie-chaplin-site-unveils-poster-art/comment-page-1/#comment-961</link>
		<dc:creator>David Blakeslee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 01:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://criterioncast.com/?p=4282#comment-961</guid>
		<description>Potential for Bluray, for starters. The 2003 releases are OOP and pretty expensive. I have no idea how thorough the supplements were in the &#039;03 sets, but I expect that Janus/Criterion would do a good job on the main features anyway, though I think an Eclipse box of collected short subjects and second-tier features would be just fine accompanied only by the customary liner notes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Potential for Bluray, for starters. The 2003 releases are OOP and pretty expensive. I have no idea how thorough the supplements were in the &#39;03 sets, but I expect that Janus/Criterion would do a good job on the main features anyway, though I think an Eclipse box of collected short subjects and second-tier features would be just fine accompanied only by the customary liner notes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Blakeslee</title>
		<link>http://criterioncast.com/2010/06/12/janus-teases-at-new-charlie-chaplin-site-unveils-poster-art/comment-page-1/#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>David Blakeslee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://criterioncast.com/?p=4282#comment-906</guid>
		<description>Potential for Bluray, for starters. The 2003 releases are OOP and pretty expensive. I have no idea how thorough the supplements were in the &#039;03 sets, but I expect that Janus/Criterion would do a good job on the main features anyway, though I think an Eclipse box of collected short subjects and second-tier features would be just fine accompanied only by the customary liner notes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Potential for Bluray, for starters. The 2003 releases are OOP and pretty expensive. I have no idea how thorough the supplements were in the &#39;03 sets, but I expect that Janus/Criterion would do a good job on the main features anyway, though I think an Eclipse box of collected short subjects and second-tier features would be just fine accompanied only by the customary liner notes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alvysinger</title>
		<link>http://criterioncast.com/2010/06/12/janus-teases-at-new-charlie-chaplin-site-unveils-poster-art/comment-page-1/#comment-905</link>
		<dc:creator>alvysinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 23:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://criterioncast.com/?p=4282#comment-905</guid>
		<description>Will they be better than the releases from 2003? And if so, in what ways? It is not like these films have been hidden from view these last many years (except maybe from the big screen) and the 2003 releases are pretty clean looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will they be better than the releases from 2003? And if so, in what ways? It is not like these films have been hidden from view these last many years (except maybe from the big screen) and the 2003 releases are pretty clean looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

