It looks like we may have our first big hit of this year’s Cannes Film Festival.
With the film festival kicking off earlier this week, buzz about films showing at the festival has taken a back seat to numerous stories of films currently being shopped around during the event. However, one film has been able to make quite a splash with critics. And it has nothing to do with Wall Street or a famous archer with an affinity for hoods.
Going into Cannes, many people wholly expected to enjoy Mike Leigh’s latest film, Another Year. However, it is proving to be the biggest critical darling so far. Leigh is the director of such critical darlins as films like Secrets and Lies, and the brilliant film, Naked, which has found a home within the Criterion Collection. He’s a fantastic filmmaker, and if critics are to be believed, we may have our first major contender for the festival’s top prize. [Readers can hear our early podcast episode, discussing Mike Leigh’s film, Naked, here.]
Here are a few of the things critics are saying about the film:
From Twitter:
Finally, a top-notch competition film. Mike Leigh’s ANOTHER YEAR is a startlingly honest and understated character study. #cannes
“On a scale of 1 to 10, how happy are you?” The crucial question in Leigh’s “Another Year.” My #Cannes Review @ http://bit.ly/9GTapH
Some less than enthusiastic responses to the film:
Mike Leigh’s Another Year is a good character piece with good performances but ultimately slow and uninteresting
Another Year was ‘another two hours’ of boring cinema. What an uninteresting and completely generic story. Absolute waste of time.
From The LA Times:
Owen Gleiberman, Entertainment Weekly: “…when I say that I loved ‘Another Year,’ the Leigh film that just premiered at Cannes, members of the Leigh cult should consider themselves warned: The movie has precious little in the way of shrieking, didactic working-class sanctimony, or cheaply lovable over-the-top gags. What it does have is an overwhelming bittersweet melancholy at the passing of life from middle age into’¦well, I guess you could call it late middle age, but then you’d be falling into the self-deception shared by the movie’s characters, who will do anything to avoid the realization that the cold and nasty word for the condition they’re heading towards is’¦old. ”
Jenny Barchfield, Associated Press:“‘Another Year” … looks at a group of middle-aged friends as they grapple with loneliness, love, loss and change over the four seasons of a single year. It’s a tribute to the talent of the British director and his outstanding cast ‘” including Leigh regulars Jim Broadbent, Ruth Sheen and Lesley Manville ‘” that the film manages to be funny and charming despite its heavy subject matter.”
Charles Gant, The Telegraph: “Initially, ‘Another Year’ appears to be another of those low-concept Leigh slice-of-life movies, emerging from his distinct improvisational method without a narrative hook or even much of a theme… But as spring passes into summer, autumn and winter, ‘Another Year’ increasingly declares its hand. This is a film about loneliness, in which a caring, considerate, loving couple cannot ever really know what it’s like to lead a life of quiet desperation.”
Ray Bennett, The Hollywood Reporter:“The veteran British director draws typically skillful performances from his cast of mostly regulars, and there are fine contributions from cinematographer Dick Pope and composer Gary Yershon. It’s a sedate film without drama that festival juries could well fall in love with, but moviegoers might decide that their own brand of misery is quite sufficient, thanks.”
Dave Calhoun, Time Out London: “Age, happiness and the passing of time are the themes that percolate movingly through Mike Leigh’s ‘˜Another Year’, his first film since 2008’s punchy, upbeat ‘˜Happy-Go-Lucky.’ It’s a serious, meditative but powerful drama that explores a year in the life of a contented, endearing professional couple in their early sixties and the friends and family who cross their path. The mood is gently resigned, questioning but not accusing of its protagonists’ choices.”
Source: LA Times
1 comment